top of page

Indiana Drones: The Future of Archaeology

Writer's picture: Emily ExpeditionEmily Expedition

When people think of archaeology, they often picture dramatic digs, dusty artifacts, and long-lost ruins finally seeing daylight after centuries underground. But before any excavation begins, archaeologists rely on cutting-edge technology to reveal what’s hidden beneath the surface. Remote sensing techniques, like Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and Magnetometry, have changed the game, making it possible to detect buried structures, artifacts, and landscapes without disturbing a site. This approach has been crucial in places like Petra, Jordan, where much of the ancient city remains buried beneath layers of sand and sediment.


Understanding Remote Sensing in Archaeology

Image via NORBIT Subsea (Source)
Image via NORBIT Subsea (Source)

Remote sensing refers to detecting and analyzing a landscape's features from a distance, using advanced technology to guide archaeological work. By providing insight into what lies beneath the ground, it helps researchers target their excavations more effectively while preserving historical sites. Some of the most commonly used remote sensing methods include:


  • Aerial Photography & Satellite Imaging – Captures landscape changes and vegetation patterns that may indicate buried structures.

  • LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) – Uses laser pulses to create detailed topographical maps, often revealing hidden features beneath dense forests or accumulated debris.

  • Magnetometry – Measures variations in the Earth's magnetic field caused by human activity, such as ancient walls, hearths, or roads.

  • Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) – Sends radio waves into the ground and analyzes the reflected signals, allowing archaeologists to visualize underground structures.


These methods help researchers locate and map sites before any physical digging occurs, preserving fragile archaeological contexts while making excavations more efficient.


Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR): A Game-Changer in Archaeology

Image via CIMS Cemetery Software (Source)
Image via CIMS Cemetery Software (Source)

Among remote sensing tools, GPR has proven especially valuable in archaeology. By transmitting electromagnetic waves into the ground, GPR can detect variations in soil density, distinguishing buried objects or architectural features from their surroundings. This allows archaeologists to create 3D maps of hidden structures without disturbing the site.


Using GPR in Petra and other sites has demonstrated just how valuable this technology is. Some of its biggest advantages include:


  • Non-Invasive Exploration – Helps map archaeological sites before digging, reducing damage to fragile areas.

  • Depth & Structure Analysis – Creates detailed 3D models of buried structures.

  • Time & Cost Efficiency – Allows archaeologists to focus on specific areas, avoiding unnecessary excavation.

  • Works in Different Environments – Whether in urban areas, deserts, or forests, GPR can adapt to different landscapes.


GPR in Action: Petra, Jordan

Photo and video credit: Professor Richard Bates, University of St. Andrews (Source)
Photo and video credit: Professor Richard Bates, University of St. Andrews (Source)

Petra, one of the most breathtaking archaeological sites in the world, is best known for its monumental rock-cut temples and tombs. However, much of this ancient Nabataean city is still buried beneath layers of sand and debris. Archaeologists have used GPR to gain a clearer picture of Petra’s subterranean layout, leading to important discoveries.


Spotted: Me, trying to unlock the secrets of The Treasury at Petra.
Spotted: Me, trying to unlock the secrets of The Treasury at Petra.

Key Findings from GPR at Petra:


  1. Buried Marketplaces & Structures – GPR surveys revealed extensive walls, courtyards, and staircases hidden under centuries of debris. This allowed archaeologists to understand the spatial organization of the city beyond its famous facades.

  2. Discovery of the Lower Market – The Lower Market, a significant commercial hub in ancient Petra, was identified through GPR analysis. It revealed a large, rectangular complex with a series of rooms likely used for storage and trade. The discovery reshaped previous assumptions about Petra’s economy and trade networks.

  3. Identification of a Monumental Structure – A large, previously unknown structure measuring approximately 56 meters by 49 meters was discovered beneath the sand near the city center. This structure included a massive platform with a staircase, suggesting it was a significant public or religious building.

  4. Excavation Strategy Benefits:

    • Determined the depth and orientation of buried structures.

    • Assisted in mapping drainage systems and pathways, revealing advanced water management strategies in the city.

    • Provided insights into Petra’s extensive infrastructure, including hidden streets and courtyards.


By using GPR, archaeologists have expanded our understanding of Petra’s urban layout and trade systems without disturbing the delicate structures buried beneath centuries of sediment.


Beyond Petra: Other Notable Sites Using GPR

Ground Penetrating Radar survey near the east facade of the Castillo Pyramid at Chichén Itzá, Yucatán, Mexico. Pic: L. G. Desmond. 1993.
Ground Penetrating Radar survey near the east facade of the Castillo Pyramid at Chichén Itzá, Yucatán, Mexico. Pic: L. G. Desmond. 1993.

Another archaeological site where GPR has proven invaluable is Chichén Itzá, Mexico. As one of the most important sites of the ancient Maya civilization, Chichén Itzá has long been studied for its architectural and ceremonial significance. GPR surveys have allowed archaeologists to detect hidden passageways beneath the Temple of Kukulcán, providing further insight into the city's sophisticated construction techniques and ceremonial practices.


El Castillo at Chichén Itzá, built by the Ancient Maya, photobombed by me.
El Castillo at Chichén Itzá, built by the Ancient Maya, photobombed by me.

Key GPR discoveries at Chichén Itzá include:


  1. Hidden Chambers and Tunnels – Beneath the Temple of Kukulcán, GPR identified an underground chamber believed to be linked to water worship, as the temple sits above a cenote.

  2. Subsurface Structural Alignments – GPR surveys have shown that various buried structures align with celestial events, reinforcing theories about the Maya’s advanced astronomical knowledge.

  3. Preservation of Archaeological Integrity – By using GPR before excavation, researchers have minimized disruption to the existing structures, ensuring that excavation occurs only in necessary areas.


These findings emphasize the role of remote sensing in non-invasive archaeology, helping to deepen our understanding of Chichén Itzá’s history without risking damage to its iconic structures.


Conclusion

Remote sensing techniques such as GPR and magnetometry have transformed archaeology by enabling non-invasive exploration of buried sites. At Petra, GPR has played a key role in uncovering hidden marketplaces and refining excavation strategies. At Chichén Itzá, GPR has provided new insights into the hidden complexities of Mayan architecture and ceremonial practices. As these technologies continue to develop, archaeologists will gain even deeper insights into ancient civilizations while preserving their cultural heritage for future generations.


-----

References


Branting, S. A. (2018). Ground-Penetrating Radar at Petra: New Insights into the Nabataean City. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 77(2), 112-125.


Conyers, L. B. (2016). Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology. Rowman & Littlefield.


Jones, R. (2019). Remote Sensing in Archaeology: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.


Levy, T. E., Smith, N. G., & Najjar, M. (2014). Digital Archaeology and the Discovery of Petra’s Hidden Structures. Antiquity, 88(339), 573-589.


National Park Service. (2023). Using Ground-Penetrating Radar in Archaeology. Retrieved from www.nps.gov


Pérez-Rodríguez, M., et al. (2020). Subsurface Mapping at Chichén Itzá Using Ground-Penetrating Radar: Evidence for Hidden Passageways. Latin American Antiquity, 31(4), 562-578.

29 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page